Know before you send Standing by
Categories 9 Registers 48 Jurisdictions 130+ --:--:-- UTC

Check who you're dealing with before the money leaves.

A regulator outranks a forum post Every gap we cannot reach is published Green never means we guarantee anyone
Try
Source board48 registers, drawn from the 34 connectors in the opening set 0 of 0 reached
Every record, every source, every gap, in one document

Uploading a document or screenshot lets us read the payment instructions and check whether the beneficiary matches the company you are being asked to trust. That is the check that saves the money. It is not enabled in this build.

Source network Idle
0%of 34
Tier A density
Authoritative sources as a share of the connector set.
0%of 34
Direct feed
Connectors with a documented API or structured feed.
Connector distribution MVP set

The nine checks

Every category, and the registers behind it.

Open any tile to read which regulators, registries and databases sit underneath that check, what each one is allowed to prove, and whether its terms permit commercial use.

-
-
-

-

Consumer experience

The one-star reviews, read first.

Positive reviews are cheap to manufacture. Negative ones are not - nobody is paid to write a one-star review. So we read those first, cluster them by what was actually done to the person, and count platforms rather than volume.

Cross-examination

What doesn't match.

Every claim, bound to the record that adjudicates it, and the two reconciled. This is the part a search engine cannot do for you.

ClaimChecked againstWhat the record saysResult
Findings

Material issues found.

Before you send

Do these three things first.

Who to call, in what order, and what to say
Published, not hidden

What we could not check, and why.

A report that shows only what it found is a report that lies by omission. Every source that should have been reached and was not is listed here.

Source authority

A forum post never outweighs a regulator.

Every record carries a tier, and the tier decides what that record is allowed to do. Fifty angry reviews cannot turn a category red on their own. One registry entry can.

Tier A
Authoritative
Government, regulator, court, official registry, sanctions list, the domain registry itself. 25 of the 34 connectors in the opening set.
Can carry red alone
Tier B
Independent structured
Security vendors, threat feeds, certificate transparency, recognised business databases, blockchain analytics.
Needs two independent
Tier C
Consumer evidence
Complaint boards, review platforms, scam trackers. Read for pattern, never for volume.
Corroborates only
Tier D
Open web
News, forums, blogs, social. Labelled community intelligence, never verified fact.
Context only
4orm
Proprietary
Shared infrastructure, reused beneficiaries, cloned sites, recycled documents, claim drift. Built from what every previous check learned.
Two signals can
Scoring

There is no trust score, and there never will be.

A single number out of a hundred gets read as permission. So the console carries two dials that say what they actually measure, and states the conclusion in words.

What we refuse to show
Trust score 81/100
Nobody reads that as "eighty-one per cent of our checks completed cleanly". Everybody reads it as "4orm says they're fine". A number that gets misread as an endorsement is worse than no number at all.
What the dials show instead
Identity confidence
Evidence coverage
One says how sure we are it is the same party. The other says how much of the picture we actually reached. Then the verdict is a sentence, not a score. Green never means 4orm guarantees anyone.
Below fifty per cent coverage the console will not conclude green. But coverage never buries a finding: a regulator caution listing produces a red result at forty-five per cent coverage exactly as it does at ninety-five. Thin evidence cannot clear anyone. It can still condemn.